Close Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Letter boxes (en) en de

Key Data Set Information
Location RER
Reference year 2024
Name
Letter boxes
Use advice for data set Scope: This ARGE EPD covers containers used for the receipt of mail. The reference product used to calculate the impact this product group has on the environment is a letter box composed primarily of stainless steel and has been selected for the LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) because it is the product with the highest impact for 1 kg of product. A validity scope analysis has also been carried out to determine the limiting factors for letter boxes covered by this EPD. In a preliminary study (simplified LCA), it has been confirmed that this EPD represents the worst-case condition and it can therefore be used to cover all letter boxes manufactured in Europe by ARGE member companies. System boundary: Type of the EPD: "cradle to gate with options, with modules C1 – C4, and module D (A1-A3, C1-C3, D and additional modules)" The analysis of the product life cycle includes the production and transport of the raw materials, the manufacture of the product and the packaging materials which are declared in modules A1-A3. Losses during production are considered as waste and are sent for recycling. No recycling processes are taken into account except for transport and electricity consumption for grinding the metals. When recycled metals are used as raw material only their transformation process is taken into account and not the extraction of the raw material. A4 module represents the transport of the finished letter box to the installation site. There is no waste associated with the installation of the product. The A5 module therefore represents only the disposal of the product packaging. The End-of-Life (EoL) stages are also considered. The transportation to the EoL disposal site is taken into account in module C2. Module C4 covers the disposal of the locks. Module C3 covers the recycling of the individual elements according to European averages, with the remaining waste divided between incineration and landfill. Such a mixed scenario is declared due to the complex material mix of the product and the dependency of the EoL-route on the EoL-route of the product the letter box has been integrated into. In practice, the end of life has been modelled as follows: when a material is sent for recycling, generic transport and electric consumption of a shredder is taken into account (corresponding to the process Grinding, metals). Only then, is the material considered to have attained the end-of-waste state. each type of waste is modelled as a transport to the treatment site with a distance of 30 km. Parts sent for recycling include electricity consumption (grinding) and a flow (Materials for recycling, unspecified).
Technical purpose of product or process These products are generally intended for mounting on or within exterior walls of buildings or walls in communal areas of flats, etc.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 7.4.01 Komponenten von Fenstern und Vorhangfassaden / Beschläge / Stahlbeschläge
  • IBUCategories: 02 Building products / Doors, windows, shutters, and related products / Building Hardware products
General comment on data set This EPD covers containers for the receipt and protection of letters and small parcels.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • gross density: 1.0 kg/m^3
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The production of a letterbox normally takes place in 3 steps: 1. preparation of the components of the semi-finished product in the factory or at external manufacturers. 2. pre-assembly of the components (in the factory) 3. final assembly (on site at the factory) The individual parts of the product are assembled manually. Technical data: Ideally, products should comply with a suitable technical specification. EN 13724:2013/AC:2016, Postal services – Apertures of private letter boxes and letter plates – Requirements and test methods is an example of such a specification and some products will comply with this. The relevant grading structure is shown in the following table: Declared unit: The declared unit for all products covered by ARGE EPD is 1 kg (of product). Since individual products will rarely weigh exactly 1 kg it is necessary to establish the exact weight of the product and then use this as a correction factor to determine the true values for 1 kg of product in the tables (Section 5).

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 14.7
  • 0.1312
  • -0.7087
  • 0
  • 0.002601
  • 0.01223
  • 0.002187
  • -3.278
Input
  • 1.01
  • 0
  • 0.5602
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 15.71
  • 0.1312
  • -0.1485
  • 0
  • 0.002601
  • 0.01223
  • 0.002187
  • -3.278
Input
  • 71.64
  • 9.336
  • 0.9255
  • 0
  • 0.1851
  • 0.0651
  • 0.1096
  • -14.3
Input
  • 4.778
  • 0
  • -0.9004
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.03533
  • 0
Input
  • 76.41
  • 9.336
  • 0.02514
  • 0
  • 0.1851
  • 0.0651
  • 0.0743
  • -14.3
Input
  • 0.5057
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.04649
  • 0.00099
  • 0.00007728
  • 0
  • 0.00001963
  • 0.00004155
  • 0.0002012
  • -0.006251
Output
  • 0.000124
  • 0.00002436
  • 1.876E-7
  • 0
  • 4.829E-7
  • 2.287E-8
  • 2.131E-7
  • -0.00001056
Output
  • 7.679
  • 0.4913
  • 0.002493
  • 0
  • 0.009739
  • 0.0002425
  • 0.243
  • -1.874
Output
  • 0.000418
  • 0.000135
  • 2.414E-7
  • 0
  • 0.000002677
  • 8.674E-7
  • 8.334E-7
  • -0.00004496
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.178
  • 0
  • 0.01534
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4556
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.06292
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001498
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4168
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.009924
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
  • 6.114
  • 0.6158
  • 0.155
  • 0
  • 0.01221
  • 0.003051
  • 0.1482
  • -1.323
  • -0.09143
  • 0
  • 0.09143
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.2
  • 0.6155
  • 0.06353
  • 0
  • 0.0122
  • 0.003043
  • 0.1482
  • -1.322
  • 0.005478
  • 0.0002462
  • 6.262E-7
  • 0
  • 0.00000488
  • 0.00000759
  • 0.000002551
  • -0.001196
  • 3.702E-7
  • 1.426E-7
  • 3.226E-10
  • 0
  • 2.828E-9
  • 1.542E-10
  • 1.03E-9
  • -6.317E-8
  • 0.02234
  • 0.001488
  • 0.00002082
  • 0
  • 0.0000295
  • 0.000006352
  • 0.00004307
  • -0.004429
  • 0.03434
  • 0.001748
  • 0.00001751
  • 0
  • 0.00003465
  • 0.00001567
  • 0.00003874
  • -0.007619
  • 0.06413
  • 0.003872
  • 0.00008255
  • 0
  • 0.00007675
  • 0.00002323
  • 0.0001545
  • -0.01413
  • 0.0002478
  • 0.000004389
  • 2.041E-8
  • 0
  • 8.701E-8
  • 3.419E-7
  • 6.285E-8
  • -0.00004432
  • 0.005613
  • 0.0003474
  • 0.000007671
  • 0
  • 0.000006886
  • 0.000002008
  • 0.0000202
  • -0.001238
  • 2.227
  • 0.02841
  • 0.0003632
  • 0
  • 0.0005631
  • 0.0007202
  • 0.001114
  • -0.3692
  • 0.0001551
  • 0.000002182
  • 6.078E-9
  • 0
  • 4.326E-8
  • 7.374E-9
  • 1.578E-8
  • -0.00003914
  • 76.32
  • 9.333
  • 0.02513
  • 0
  • 0.185
  • 0.06447
  • 0.07427
  • -14.3

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Comparative toxic unit for humans (carcinogenic) (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.131E-7
  • 2.356E-10
  • 4.16E-12
  • 0
  • 4.67E-12
  • 8.673E-13
  • 6.589E-12
  • -2.547E-8
Comparative toxic unit for humans (noncarcinogenic) (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.5E-7
  • 7.402E-9
  • 1.721E-10
  • 0
  • 1.467E-10
  • 2.817E-11
  • 1.453E-10
  • -3.207E-8
Incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 4.923E-7
  • 4.945E-8
  • 1.775E-10
  • 0
  • 9.803E-10
  • 4.188E-11
  • 6.366E-10
  • -1.079E-7
Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IR) 1
  • 0.2324
  • 0.04052
  • 0.00007621
  • 0
  • 0.0008032
  • 0.0005873
  • 0.0002694
  • -0.02817
Comparative toxic unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 188.7
  • 7.325
  • 0.0324
  • 0
  • 0.1452
  • 0.03245
  • 0.327
  • -42.65
Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 41.01
  • 6.505
  • 0.01244
  • 0
  • 0.1289
  • 0.009917
  • 0.1106
  • -7.381