Process Data set: Lock Series Confidant - Smart hotel door lock (en)

Process Data set: Lock Series Confidant - Smart hotel door lock (en) en de

Process information

Key Data Set Information
Location	GLO
Reference year	2024
Name	Lock Series Confidant - Smart hotel door lock
Use advice for data set	Scope: This Environmental Product Declaration refers to a specific electronic lock manufactured by dormakaba. The EPD is representative for the Confidant Lock Series. The production site is located in Montreal (Canada). The data represents the year 2024. System boundary: The type of EPD is: cradle to gate with options, modules C1–C4, and module D (A1–A3 + C + D and additional modules: A4+ A5) Production - Module A1-A3 The product stage includes: — A1, raw material extraction, processing and mechanical treatments, processing of secondary material input (e.g. recycling processes), — A2, transport to the manufacturer, — A3, manufacturing and assembly including provision of all materials, products and energy, as well as waste processing up to the end-of-waste state. A3 (gate) is located in Montreal, Canada. Construction stage - Modules A4-A5 The construction process stage includes: — A4, transport to the building site; — A5, installation into the building; including provision of all materials, products and energy, as well as waste processing up to the end-of-waste state or disposal of final residues during the construction process stage. Maintenance – Module B2 This module includes the production and the end of life of the batteries. The potential use of batteries is declared in module B2. End-of-life stage– Modules C1-C4 and D The end-of-life stage includes: — C1, de-construction, demolition: — C2, transport to waste processing; — C3, waste processing for reuse, recovery and/or recycling; — C4, disposal; including provision and all transport, provision of all materials, products and related energy and water use. Module D (Benefits and loads beyond the system boundary) includes: — D, recycling potentials, expressed as net impacts and benefits.
Technical purpose of product or process	The Lock Series Confidant is suitable for small to very large-scale hotels. It easily replaces existing mechanical or electronic door locks. The electronic lock offers access control for guest rooms, common areas, and back-of-house. The lock is available with mortise or tubular latch applications.
Classification	Class name : Hierarchy level OEKOBAU.DAT: 7.7.01 Komponenten von Fenstern und Vorhangfassaden / Antriebssysteme / mechanisch IBUCategories: 02 Building products / Doors, windows, shutters, and related products / Electronic and physical Access Control Systems
General comment on data set	The Lock Series Confidant combines graceful lines, clean aesthetics and contactless Near Field Communication (NFC) technology to provide an enhanced guest experience. This Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) enabled lock can operate with dormakaba mobile access solutions, allowing guests to use their mobile devices as room keys. The modern looking Confidant lock works conveniently with dormakaba access management software and as a stand alone device. For the Lock Series Confidant the standards which can be applied are the following: * EN 179 * EN 12209 * EN 1634-1 * EN 1363-1 * ÖNORM B3859 * 2011/65/EU (RoHS) * UL 10C * ULC CAN - S104 The CE-marking takes into account the proof of conformity with the respective harmonized standards based on the legal provisions above.
Copyright	Yes
Owner of data set	dormakaba International Holding GmbH
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)	Lock Series Confidant - Smart hotel door lock - 1.0 * 1.0 Stück (Number of pieces)
Material properties of the reference flow	weight per piece: 3.5 kg
Biogenic carbon content	Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.2 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until	2029
Publication date	2024-12-20
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system	The Confidant lock series combines sleek lines, clean aesthetics and Near Field Communication (NFC) contactless technology to provide a better guest experience. This Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) enabled lock can be operated with dormakaba's mobile access solutions, allowing guests to use their mobile devices as room keys. Technical data: The Electronic Lock Confidant has following technical properties:

Modelling and validation

Subtype

specific dataset

LCA methodology report

Electronic and physical Access Control Systems.pdf

Data sources, treatment and representativeness

Documentation of data quality management

Electronic and physical Access Control Systems.pdf

Data source(s) used for this data set

Original EPDs

Lock Series Confidant.pdf

Completeness

Validation

Type of review
Accredited third party review

Reviewer name and institution
Institut Bauen und Umwelt e. V.

Compliance Declarations

Compliance

Compliance system name

DIN EN 15804+A2

Approval of overall compliance

Nomenclature compliance

Methodological compliance

Review compliance

Documentation compliance

Quality compliance

Compliance

Compliance system name

ISO 14025

Approval of overall compliance

Nomenclature compliance

Methodological compliance

Review compliance

Documentation compliance

Quality compliance

Administrative information

Commissioner and goal
Commissioner of data set	dormakaba International Holding GmbH
Data generator
Data set generator / modeller	dormakaba International Holding GmbH
Data entry by
Time stamp (last saved)	2024-12-20T00:00:00
Data set format(s)	ILCD Format EPD Data Format Extensions v1.2
Publication and ownership
UUID	9f3838f6-c4e8-43d4-9022-3f5d0dcbac37
Date of last revision	2024-12-20T10:42:00+01:00
Data set version	00.01.001
Registration authority	Institut Bauen und Umwelt e. V.
Registration number	EPD-DOR-20240565-CBA1-EN
Owner of data set	dormakaba International Holding GmbH
Copyright	Yes
License type	Free of charge for all users and uses
Access and use restrictions	None
Publisher	Institut Bauen und Umwelt e. V.

Environmental indicators

Indicators of life cycle

Indicator	Direction	Unit	Production A1-A3	Transport A4	Installation A5	Maintenance B2	Transport C2	Waste processing C3	Disposal C4	Recycling Potential D
Renewable primary energy as energy carrier (PERE)	Input	MJ	94.89	0.001	6.406	0.1972	0.0006275	0.021	0.004	-11.97
Renewable primary energy resources as material utilization (PERM)	Input	MJ	6.36	0	-6.36	0	0	0	0	0
Total use of renewable primary energy resources (PERT)	Input	MJ	101.2	0.001	0.046	0.1972	0.0006275	0.021	0.004	-11.97
Non renewable primary energy as energy carrier (PENRE)	Input	MJ	426.6	0.415	0.679	2.372	0.199	4.041	0.03	-61.55
Non renewable primary energy as material utilization (PENRM)	Input	MJ	4.388	0	-0.43	0	0	-3.958	0	0
Total use of non renewable primary energy resources (PENRT)	Input	MJ	431	0.415	0.249	2.372	0.199	0.082	0.03	-61.55
Use of secondary material (SM)	Input	kg	1.961	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Use of renewable secondary fuels (RSF)	Input	MJ	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Use of non renewable secondary fuels (NRSF)	Input	MJ	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Use of net fresh water (FW)	Input	m^3	0.2511	0.000002347	0.002	0.0007226	0.000001126	0.0004353	0.000007529	-0.047
Hazardous waste disposed (HWD)	Output	kg	0.00002423	4.028E-11	3.946E-10	1.145E-8	1.932E-11	3.144E-10	4.552E-10	-9.605E-7
Non hazardous waste disposed (NHWD)	Output	kg	1.493	0.00004246	0.026	1.003	0.00002037	0.018	0.15	-0.253
Radioactive waste disposed (RWD)	Output	kg	0.01301	4.458E-7	0.00001291	0.00004868	2.138E-7	0.000003061	3.399E-7	-0.002
Components for re-use (CRU)	Output	kg	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Materials for recycling (MFR)	Output	kg	0	0	0	0	0	3.138	0	0
Materials for energy recovery (MER)	Output	kg	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Exported electrical energy (EEE)	Output	MJ	0	0	1.184	0	0	0.658	0	0
Exported thermal energy (EET)	Output	MJ	0	0	2.17	0	0	1.523	0	0

Core environmental impact indicators

Indicator	Unit	Production A1-A3	Transport A4	Installation A5	Maintenance B2	Transport C2	Waste processing C3	Disposal C4	Recycling Potential D
Global Warming Potential total (GWP-total)	kg CO_(2) eq	35.37	0.031	0.777	0.209	0.015	0.178	0.002	-4.817
Global Warming Potential biogenic (GWP-biogenic)	kg CO_(2) eq	-0.679	0.001	0.733	0.0002883	0.0006487	0.000004145	0.000007775	0.003
Global Warming Potential fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)	kg CO_(2) eq	36	0.029	0.044	0.209	0.014	0.178	0.002	-4.813
Global Warming Potential luluc (GWP-luluc)	kg CO_(2) eq	0.04802	6.964E-7	0.0000138	0.00008675	3.34E-7	0.00001006	0.000006549	-0.006
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)	kg CFC11 eq	2.915E-9	3.089E-18	1.483E-16	7.193E-16	1.482E-18	8.973E-17	8.437E-18	-1.979E-14
Formation potential of tropospheric ozone photochemical oxidants (POCP)	kg NMVOC eq	0.111	0.00002635	0.0002042	0.0007848	0.00001264	0.00001976	0.00001272	-0.013
Acidification potential of land and water (AP)	mol H^(+) eq	0.216	0.00002928	0.000215	0.002113	0.00001405	0.00003167	0.00001632	-0.034
Eutrophication potential terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)	mol N eq	0.406	0.0001036	0.0009679	0.002323	0.00004968	0.0001443	0.00004616	-0.041
Eutrophication potential aquatic freshwater (EP-freshwater)	kg P eq	0.0002408	6.262E-9	2.853E-8	1.479E-7	3.004E-9	1.431E-8	3.908E-9	-0.00000865
Eutrophication potential aquatic marine (EP-marine)	kg N eq	0.03787	0.000009319	0.00007701	0.0002539	0.00000447	0.000007143	0.000004201	-0.004
Water use (WDP)	m^(3) world eq deprived	9.339	0.00005733	0.096	0.02301	0.0000275	0.018	0.0002385	-1.505
Abiotic depletion potential for non fossil resources (ADPE)	kg Sb eq	0.01007	8.775E-10	2.315E-9	0.000009052	4.209E-10	1.231E-9	2.044E-10	-0.002
Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources (ADPF)	MJ	430.9	0.415	0.249	2.37	0.199	0.082	0.03	-61.49

Additional environmental impact indicators

Indicator	Unit	Production A1-A3	Transport A4	Installation A5	Maintenance B2	Operational energy use B6	De-construction C1	Transport C2	Waste processing C3	Disposal C4	Recycling Potential D
¹This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
²The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Comparative toxic unit for humans (carcinogenic) (HTP-c)²	CTUh	4.969E-7	5.532E-12	6.337E-12	5.97E-11	0	0	2.654E-12	2.679E-12	2.528E-12	5.219E-9
Comparative toxic unit for humans (noncarcinogenic) (HTP-nc)²	CTUh	8.741E-7	2.366E-10	2.968E-10	3.415E-9	0	0	1.135E-10	2.713E-10	2.786E-10	9.751E-7
Incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM)²	Disease incidence	0.000002299	1.539E-10	1.223E-9	1.52E-8	0	0	7.384E-11	4.042E-10	2.021E-10	-4.03E-7
Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IR)¹	kBq U235 eq	1.358	0.0000637	0.002	0.005242	0	0	0.00003056	0.0002758	0.00003497	-0.234
Comparative toxic unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw)²	CTUe	202.8	0.294	0.117	0.606	0	0	0.141	0.031	0.017	-29.9
Soil quality index (SQP)²	SQP	170.6	0.001	0.066	0.4612	0	0	0.0005115	0.025	0.006	-11.42