Close Collapse all sections
Process Data set: best wood CLT BOX (en) en de

Key Data Set Information
Location DE
Reference year 2024
Name
best wood CLT BOX
Use advice for data set Scope: Die vorliegende Umwelt-Produktdeklaration bezieht sich auf 1m best wood CLT BOX, welches von der Firma Holzwerk Gebr. Schneider GmbH am Standort Eberhardzell (Deutschland) hergestellt wird. System boundary: This EPD is a cradle-to-grave analysis and module D, it includes the following life cycle phases: A1-A3 | Production stage The production stage includes the manufacture of all components of the declared product (wooden slats and adhesives) as well as the packaging, including the respective upstream chains up to the extraction of raw materials. The transportation of the components and packaging materials to the production site is also taken into account. All expenses for the production of the CLT BOX elements are taken into account within the factory limits. A4-A5 | Construction stage This stage includes the transportation of the CLT BOX elements to the construction site (A4) as well as the expenses for installation in the building (A5). Furthermore the disposal of packaging waste is taken into account here. B1-B7 | Utilization stage This stage deals with the utilization phase of the product.However, if used properly, no environmentally relevant processes occur during the period of use. C1-C4 | Disposal stage The disposal stage includes dismantling (C1), which in this case was assumed to be a manual process with negligible environmental impacts. Furthermore, the transportation of the dismantled product, which is therefore waste, to the waste treatment plant (C2) and its thermal recovery (C3) are also taken into account. In this case, no environmentally relevant processes are included in C4. D | Advantages and drawbacks outside the system boundary The advantages of thermal recycling of offcuts and packaging waste (from A5) and of the product itself (from C3) are considered here.
Technical purpose of product or process The product best wood CLT BOX is used in the structural area of modern timber construction. The areas of application include residential, industrial and bridge construction. It can be used in utilisation classes 1 and 2 in accordance with EN 1995-1-1.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 3.2.02 Holz / Holzwerkstoffe / Sperrholz
  • IBUCategories: 02 Bauprodukte / Produkte aus Bauholz / Vollholzprodukte
General comment on data set The best wood CLT BOX product consists of best wood CLT with three glued-on GLULAM ribs and a CLT cover. The wooden box element is a statically effective and at the same time space-creating wood element, which is suitable for all ceiling requirements thanks to its versatile dimensions and construction characteristics.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • gross density: 200.58 kg/m^3
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The best wood CLT BOX product is manufactured by combining the best wood CLT and best wood BSH products. In the first processing step, 2-3 glulam ribs are glued to a CLT panel as a base plate. Depending on the application, the cavity between the glulam ribs can be fitted with fixtures in the subsequent process. When used as a ceiling element, the product is pressed together with an upper CLT panel. Once the bonding has hardened, the final surface treatment is carried out using a profiling planer and the customised trimming and packaging. If required, the surface can be finished before packaging. Technical data: The technical construction data shown below is valid for the product best wood CLT BOX as delivered. Depending on the cross-section structure (number of ribs, rib width and height) and the load position of the best wood CLT BOX, the physical building properties such as component resistance or fire resistance vary. The design is carried out in accordance with EN 1995-1-1; the best wood STATICS software is available for preliminary design. Declared unit: The declared unit for this Environmental Product Declaration is defined as 1 m in accordance with the specifications of the corresponding PCR: Solid wood product. The density of the wooden box element, taking into account the air gaps, is 200.58 kg/m at a delivery moisture content of 10 %.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
Maintenance
B2
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 280.8
  • 1.698
  • 0.09574
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.857
  • 3478
  • 0
  • -460.1
Input
  • 3463
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -3463
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3743
  • 1.698
  • 0.09574
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.857
  • 15.3
  • 0
  • -460.1
Input
  • 1212
  • 29.61
  • 8.875
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 119.6
  • 104
  • 0
  • -2069
Input
  • 33.59
  • 0
  • -8.519
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -25.07
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1245
  • 29.61
  • 0.3564
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 119.6
  • 78.96
  • 0
  • -2069
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.3574
  • 0.001945
  • 0.001436
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.007853
  • 0.8827
  • 0
  • -0.448
Output
  • 3.504E-7
  • 1.56E-9
  • 6.228E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.302E-9
  • 1.424E-8
  • 0
  • -4.646E-7
Output
  • 0.921
  • 0.004646
  • 0.002622
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01876
  • 2.607
  • 0
  • -0.9644
Output
  • 0.05214
  • 0.00005372
  • 0.0000284
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002169
  • 0.004378
  • 0
  • -0.1474
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.34
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 524.8
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.383
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 942.5
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
Maintenance
B2
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
  • -243.8
  • 2.23
  • 0.6462
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.923
  • 338
  • 0
  • -119.5
  • -332.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 332.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 88.56
  • 2.212
  • 0.6462
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.849
  • 5.361
  • 0
  • -119.4
  • 0.2978
  • 0.01811
  • 0.00008922
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.07312
  • 0.003441
  • 0
  • -0.08157
  • 9.546E-8
  • 4.374E-16
  • 2.641E-16
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.766E-15
  • 4.758E-14
  • 0
  • -1.342E-12
  • 0.3448
  • 0.002072
  • 0.00009582
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04461
  • 0.04605
  • 0
  • -0.1238
  • 0.2838
  • 0.002379
  • 0.0001288
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04743
  • 0.05161
  • 0
  • -0.1543
  • 1.288
  • 0.009074
  • 0.0005947
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2543
  • 0.246
  • 0
  • -0.4725
  • 0.0005282
  • 0.000006581
  • 5.699E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002658
  • 0.000006522
  • 0
  • -0.0001542
  • 0.1191
  • 0.0007659
  • 0.00004053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.02293
  • 0.01695
  • 0
  • -0.04409
  • 6.663
  • 0.02056
  • 0.0594
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.08302
  • 37.54
  • 0
  • -8.89
  • 0.00003271
  • 1.964E-7
  • 4.149E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.929E-7
  • 7.253E-7
  • 0
  • -0.00001963
  • 1245
  • 29.51
  • 0.3559
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 119.2
  • 78.92
  • 0
  • -2069

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
Maintenance
B2
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Comparative toxic unit for humans (carcinogenic) (HTP-c) 2
  • 5.243E-8
  • 4.428E-10
  • 7.722E-12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.789E-9
  • 2.292E-9
  • 0
  • -1.964E-8
Comparative toxic unit for humans (noncarcinogenic) (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000003769
  • 2.299E-8
  • 2.971E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.826E-8
  • 8.175E-8
  • 0
  • -7.762E-7
Incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00005369
  • 1.62E-8
  • 7.148E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.865E-7
  • 2.587E-7
  • 0
  • -0.000001328
Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IR) 1
  • 4.805
  • 0.007856
  • 0.004634
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03173
  • 0.6939
  • 0
  • -24.13
Comparative toxic unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 650.4
  • 21.9
  • 0.1905
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 88.43
  • 34.1
  • 0
  • -425.3
Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 5.915E+4
  • 10.14
  • 0.1129
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 40.96
  • 21.61
  • 0
  • -316